stepbystep wrote:And yet we have state sanctioned destruction of ecosystems that make this look utterly insignificant, and here's a thread on the forum with this name about the stupid actions of a few wood-hookers...ask yourself who should be demonised and who are the idiots?
north-north-west wrote:stepbystep wrote:And yet we have state sanctioned destruction of ecosystems that make this look utterly insignificant, and here's a thread on the forum with this name about the stupid actions of a few wood-hookers...ask yourself who should be demonised and who are the idiots?
It is perfectly possible to be outraged by more than one thing at time.
The ban on political posts makes talking about forestry in Tassie rather problematical.
Son of a Beach wrote:In any case, both types of idiots deserve to be called on it. This lot because the are breaking the law, the other lot because they control the law and manipulate it to their own benefit. All of them because they are unnecessarily destructive and putting commercial short term gain ahead of long term conservation values.
Son of a Beach wrote:In any case, both types of idiots deserve to be called on it. This lot because the are breaking the law, the other lot because they control the law and manipulate it to their own benefit. All of them because they are unnecessarily destructive and putting commercial short term gain ahead of long term conservation values.
Son of a Beach wrote:In any case, both types of idiots deserve to be called on it. This lot because the are breaking the law, the other lot because they control the law and manipulate it to their own benefit. All of them because they are unnecessarily destructive and putting commercial short term gain ahead of long term conservation values.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests