walkinTas wrote:I too think that walking poles are pretty well essential for long descents. They can get in the way a bit on tracks with close bush on either side, so it is a good idea to get a pole that can easily be tucked away on the pack when its not needed. I have had a couple of pole-induced falls where I have tripped over my walking pole, but on the other side I have had a couple of big saves on down hill sections thanks to my walking pole.
I bought a mono-pod that has a quick release head, with the hope of combining the walking pole and tripod into one item. Unfortunately the mono-pod wasn't up to the job, because it wasn't strong enough to support my weight on steep descents. I sometimes strap my walking pole to my wrist and use it as an extra support for hand-held shots, but it is not really a good substitute for a mono-pod. So I'm still looking for the mono-pod / walking pole combo.
under10kg wrote:I think the pacer pole comes with an attachment in that you can attach your camera to the top of the pole. Not sure if this would help.
walkinTas wrote:Tas-man, I was surfing looking for a ball head that might fit. Have got / can you get some pics and some more details? Which camera are you using on the walking pole?
photohiker wrote:Alloy for me. The weight savings of the carbon are not enough when compared to the greater risk of tube fracture. You can bend and crush alloy and still have a (bent, wonky, but usable) pole, but when the carbon gets the same treatment it fractures.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests