benjabimon wrote:Is hunting the rich acceptable?
north-north-west wrote:There's a difference between accepting hunting and promoting it. The slogan 'Hunt anything...' is highly problematic in itself.
aronwidforss wrote:I'm not looking for a debate, but I would be very interested in why different people find hunting immoral. I am looking to get a hunter's license myself and currently only eat meat from wild animals and reindeer.
aronwidforss wrote:I'm not looking for a debate, but I would be very interested in why different people find hunting immoral. I am looking to get a hunter's license myself and currently only eat meat from wild animals and reindeer.
andrewa wrote:Sorry, Moondog, but, whilst this post is less relevant to tent choice, I am really impressed that someone can only eat meat that they have hunted themselves.....a bit like your comment asking whether non hunters were vegetarians. This guy clearly isn't.
stry wrote:benjabimon wrote:Is hunting the rich acceptable?
I suppose that if you are happy to forego the wide range of social subsidies, to say nothing of health, defence and education; that are financed directly or indirectly by the "rich", your question could be debated.
benjabimon wrote:stry wrote:benjabimon wrote:Is hunting the rich acceptable?
I suppose that if you are happy to forego the wide range of social subsidies, to say nothing of health, defence and education; that are financed directly or indirectly by the "rich", your question could be debated.
Does their wealth trickle down?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests