Hydrostatic Head

Bushwalking gear and paraphernalia. Electronic gadget topics (inc. GPS, PLB, chargers) belong in the 'Techno Babble' sub-forum.
Forum rules
TIP: The online Bushwalk Inventory System can help bushwalkers with a variety of bushwalk planning tasks, including: Manage which items they take bushwalking so that they do not forget anything they might need, plan meals for their walks, and automatically compile food/fuel shopping lists (lists of consumables) required to make and cook the meals for each walk. It is particularly useful for planning for groups who share food or other items, but is also useful for individual walkers.

Hydrostatic Head

Postby Aztec » Fri 19 May, 2017 1:35 pm

Hi Everyone...
Just a curious question on hydrostatic head - and how it stacks up in the real world...

Just noticing the HH values for tents, varying from 1000mm to around 6000mm (for rainflys mainly)

Anyone have any experience with this? I've had a tent which has a rainfly that said 3000mm - but wicked through like a cotton sheet...
But on the other hand - I've had lower spec rainflys, that I could've camped underwater and still stayed dry...

Just seeing what people have found, advice etc...
Cheers,
Richard

“Thoughts come clearly while one walks.” - Thomas Mann



User avatar
Aztec
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon 01 Sep, 2014 3:16 pm
Location: Glenorchy
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Hydrostatic Head

Postby Mark F » Fri 19 May, 2017 4:12 pm

I believe the generally accepted minimum hh for tent flys is 1500mm while for a decently waterproof floor 3000 or 5000mm seem to be the go. The surface does need to be clean and preferably with a dwr finish so the water beads and runs off. As usual what is printed on the packet/advert isn't always correct. The level of proofing applied can vary widely even on the same roll of fabric.

I have just purchased a cheap blood pressure kit ($15.50 for gauge, cuff and stethoscope) http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/182469649769 with the intention of making a water head tester. There is a post on this on bpl https://backpackinglight.com/forums/topic/44977/.
"Perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove".
User avatar
Mark F
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2332
Joined: Mon 19 Sep, 2011 8:14 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory
Gender: Male

Re: Hydrostatic Head

Postby Aztec » Fri 19 May, 2017 4:40 pm

Cheers,
I was wondering whether the DWR plays more of a role than I initially though... 1000mm HH with great DWR vs 3000mm HH and poor/no DWR...
Cheers,
Richard

“Thoughts come clearly while one walks.” - Thomas Mann



User avatar
Aztec
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon 01 Sep, 2014 3:16 pm
Location: Glenorchy
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Hydrostatic Head

Postby Strider » Fri 19 May, 2017 7:12 pm

What about Silnylon, which has no DWR?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
User avatar
Strider
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 6030
Joined: Mon 07 Nov, 2011 6:55 pm
Location: Point Cook
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Hydrostatic Head

Postby Gadgetgeek » Fri 19 May, 2017 7:16 pm

DWR can play a huge part as it is essentially using surface tension as free waterproofing, if the fabric itself never gets wet, it doesn't need to hold anything out.

I suspect that because Sil doesn't have any DWR that's why the thinner stuff is prone to misting under direct raindrop impact. So the heavier stuff would be much more resistant to that, I have no idea what the pressures involved would be, but I'm sure a raindrop on impact imparts a lot of pressure in a very small spot.
Gadgetgeek
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1214
Joined: Sun 23 Sep, 2012 4:10 pm
Region: Queensland
Gender: Male

Re: Hydrostatic Head

Postby Franco » Sat 20 May, 2017 9:12 am

Aztec,
Simply because a tent is claimed to have a 3000mm waterhead, it does not mean that it has.

There are many tents on the market with a 1200mm waterhead rating and from well known brands, for example MSR, BA and Nemo, coincidentally all three brands are made by the same company.
Eureka even sells tents with a published 800mm rating.
At Tarptent years ago we used a type of silnylon that was rated 1200mm. Under big blobs dropped from trees it could mist.
On that fabric I never had penetration otherwise even under severe thunderstorm.
We now use a silnylon that is rated 3000 mm.
Last edited by Franco on Sat 20 May, 2017 10:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Franco
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Thu 30 Oct, 2008 6:48 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Hydrostatic Head

Postby Orion » Sat 20 May, 2017 10:28 am

Just for the sake of comparison...

Our Hilleberg Nallo has 3000mm head for the fly and 5000mm for the floor.

Our tent is from 2008, so it's old technology.

A 2017 Nallo has 5000mm head for the fly and 15,000mm for the floor.
The Nallo is a mid-weight Hilleberg model.
The more serious models have 5500mm for the fly and 20,000mm for the floor.
Orion
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1963
Joined: Mon 02 Feb, 2009 12:33 pm
Region: Other Country

Re: Hydrostatic Head

Postby Aztec » Sat 20 May, 2017 12:49 pm

Yeah, the old saying you get what you pay for...
Cheers,
Richard

“Thoughts come clearly while one walks.” - Thomas Mann



User avatar
Aztec
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon 01 Sep, 2014 3:16 pm
Location: Glenorchy
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male


Return to Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests