Huntsman247 wrote:Hmmm.... Sounds like its not going to be much of a benefit to myself then. I generally don't consolidate cooking gear.
Does anyone know where I can get a 900 ml pot like the above pic without the heatsink but with measurements etched in?
CasualNerd wrote:Huntsman247 wrote:Hmmm.... Sounds like its not going to be much of a benefit to myself then. I generally don't consolidate cooking gear.
Does anyone know where I can get a 900 ml pot like the above pic without the heatsink but with measurements etched in?
That same pot or very similar is available from Optimus without the heatsink, from Paddy Palin or online.
Yeah but it's much smaller. You can't fit a 230g canister inside. The other optimus pot is only 0.6LCasualNerd wrote:Huntsman247 wrote:Hmmm.... Sounds like its not going to be much of a benefit to myself then. I generally don't consolidate cooking gear.
Does anyone know where I can get a 900 ml pot like the above pic without the heatsink but with measurements etched in?
That same pot or very similar is available from Optimus without the heatsink, from Paddy Palin or online.
Moondog55 wrote:CasualNerd wrote:Huntsman247 wrote:Hmmm.... Sounds like its not going to be much of a benefit to myself then. I generally don't consolidate cooking gear.
Does anyone know where I can get a 900 ml pot like the above pic without the heatsink but with measurements etched in?
That same pot or very similar is available from Optimus without the heatsink, from Paddy Palin or online.
Also ALDI when they have the outside sales.
I do think a pot which is more squat [ wider / less tall] uses much less fuel and heats faster at the same time
It is very easy to make a mark at various levels by using a blunt nail and a small hammer
Huntsman247 wrote:I think your right about the wider pot. As for the marking however I don't want to damage the oxide coating to expose the aluminium. Not the most healthy thing.
Huntsman247 wrote:As for the marking however I don't want to damage the oxide coating to expose the aluminium. Not the most healthy thing.
Ok that is not a bad idea at all.Warin wrote:Huntsman247 wrote:As for the marking however I don't want to damage the oxide coating to expose the aluminium. Not the most healthy thing.
And it makes it harder to clean up. But a solution is at your finger tips.
Mark your spoon/fork/etc with the required heights for the volumes you want.
Moondog55 wrote:Huntsman247 wrote:I think your right about the wider pot. As for the marking however I don't want to damage the oxide coating to expose the aluminium. Not the most healthy thing.
It shouldn't do that, but anyway the oxide comes back almost immediately and the risks posed by aluminium are greatly over-exaggerated.
You get more aluminium in your system by crunching a Quik-Eze than in a lifetime of cooking
Awesome! Thanks for the linky. Just ordered one.MeanderingFlyFisher wrote:Takes a month or 2 too get to here but this is what I use https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Camping-Hiking-Foldable-Cookware-Set-Pot-Pan-O4W1/253287835668?epid=1171037027&hash=item3af921a814%3Ag%3A-6sAAOSweM1aIMZy&_sacat=16034&_nkw=hiking+pot&_from=R40&rt=n and fits 230gm canister.Also has markings on it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests