Re: tarkine?
Posted: Tue 07 Jun, 2016 12:44 pm
That wasn't very nice sbs, rather nasty in fact. If you don't know what i'm on about don't respond. I wasn't particularly addressing you anyway.
As usual despite what you say, it goes: What are you on about, yada, nada, i'll pick this and run with it.. you sound to be almost verging on hysterical to me. It's a bit odd, something not right there, i'll restrain myself.
Look around, there are projects underway or holding time across our world heritage area. I had heard there were already buildings in place down there, I don't ask or search too much lately, these projects make me feel physically ill. You know, ill, it just happens, not by choice or with purpose.
EOI, incursions into 'Wilderness', you are either for them or against?
Not opposing them is one thing, endorsing them another. Joining in is disgusting.
Luckily anyone can make a proposal and it won't mean much. Hopefully those in our government don't find a political purpose to agree to much. They've gone too far themselves already. Even the language looks more likely that the only agreeable compromise will be tourism And mining. So best not guild our personal end of the turd here.
Ask for someone else's money, back yourselves? I don't much care, while i'd not and didn't question commitment, such action is white noise to conservation. It's a rather a rudimentary industry you endorse, understandable but please encourage those involved to a bigger vision.
As usual despite what you say, it goes: What are you on about, yada, nada, i'll pick this and run with it.. you sound to be almost verging on hysterical to me. It's a bit odd, something not right there, i'll restrain myself.
Look around, there are projects underway or holding time across our world heritage area. I had heard there were already buildings in place down there, I don't ask or search too much lately, these projects make me feel physically ill. You know, ill, it just happens, not by choice or with purpose.
EOI, incursions into 'Wilderness', you are either for them or against?
Not opposing them is one thing, endorsing them another. Joining in is disgusting.
Luckily anyone can make a proposal and it won't mean much. Hopefully those in our government don't find a political purpose to agree to much. They've gone too far themselves already. Even the language looks more likely that the only agreeable compromise will be tourism And mining. So best not guild our personal end of the turd here.
Ask for someone else's money, back yourselves? I don't much care, while i'd not and didn't question commitment, such action is white noise to conservation. It's a rather a rudimentary industry you endorse, understandable but please encourage those involved to a bigger vision.