Nuts wrote:It's now possible to imagine The Walls, Frenchmans, Cradle , Sth Coast equally homogenized?
The private sector is in place for their part. What's next? What is 'sustainable' growth?
All in the time-frame?, ten years between new realities and unimaginable outcomes enough?
Shazam! A networked 'wilderness' with precedents for degrading the remainder.
Lost wrote:... huts in the Walls with helicopter ....
Lost wrote:Nuts wrote:It's now possible to imagine The Walls, Frenchmans, Cradle , Sth Coast equally homogenized?
The private sector is in place for their part. What's next? What is 'sustainable' growth?
All in the time-frame?, ten years between new realities and unimaginable outcomes enough?
Shazam! A networked 'wilderness' with precedents for degrading the remainder.
I believe riverfly has applied for huts in the Walls with helicopter fishing experience through out the area.
scrub boy wrote:if true but the proposal is actually for a standing camp on Halls Island
Resources Minister Guy Barnett said Forestry Tasmania sold the business to a private operator because its core business was “clearing forests, mismanaging land and killing wildlife”.
north-north-west wrote:Resources Minister Guy Barnett said Forestry Tasmania sold the business to a private operator because its core business was “clearing forests, mismanaging land and killing wildlife”.
Fixed.
geoskid wrote:north-north-west wrote:Resources Minister Guy Barnett said Forestry Tasmania sold the business to a private operator because its core business was “clearing forests, mismanaging land and killing wildlife”.
Fixed.
Oh no, not you too NNW.
Where Ideology takes a higher priority than honesty. When It is OK to misquote.
Whatever.
That's the type of thinking that gets Trump elected.
north-north-west wrote:NO. Don't blame people who can't stand doublespeak and *&^%$#! for that travesty.
I've lived on this island for long enough to know how things operate here. I've been through the HEC's reign, I've seen what FT and the mining sector have done and continue to do. It's not ideology and it's not a misquote. It's a clearer and more honest statement of the real situation.
Nuts wrote:The outcome hardly their agenda. Let's stick to scotty's op?, rather than start ft wars round 3.. even then, unless, of course, we are prepared to discuss tourism's instrument in the same sweeping light (Tas Parks & Wildlife service). Folks here are.. / were.. timid enough.
Nuts wrote:A lot of ill-crafted quaff to me, disassociated from wilderness, pretenders, silver spoons or perhaps with good intentions and just ill-informed, or disingenuous.. it makes little difference.
At the very least, perhaps someone with a line to these green 'gods' can point out this Lie:
"It started back in 1987 with Cradle Mountain Huts, the first overnight commercial trekking operation in an Australian national park"
The first commercial overnight trekking operations in Australia started more than half a century before this. Twenty years earlier, at least three modern nature-based tourism companies started operation offering overnight 'trekking' tours in the modern context. The first on the Overland Track (from whom political leeches started to see $ signs and simply took customers) was Eric Sargent with his Craclair Tours.
Minimal impact origins!, public facilitation without any need for exclusivity, an inconvenient truth?
Read more: http://www.afr.com/brand/afr-magazine/h ... z4UOgfglkW
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests