Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli access

Tasmania specific bushwalking discussion.
Forum rules
Tasmania specific bushwalking discussion. Please avoid publishing details of access to sensitive areas with no tracks.

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Lophophaps » Sat 18 Apr, 2020 3:26 pm

Taswegian, well said. When I started writing submissions about this sort of thing my focus was that which I saw to be obvious - nature. Over time this is still very obvious to me, but now my focus emphasises economics. To appreciate the nature aspect the reader must have a similar mindset, and not many people in government have this, especially when the minister says not to give nature much weight.

So I include hard figures, good estimates, return on equity, discounted cashflow and the like. If possible I include how voters feel. This can be useful in marginal electorates. These will be much more easily understood by bean counters than esoteric things like the value of wilderness or a local park.

Giving too much power to a minister with limited review is a breach of democracy, and this may also me a matter for inclusion in submissions.
User avatar
Lophophaps
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed 09 Nov, 2011 9:45 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby johnrs » Sat 25 Apr, 2020 1:37 pm

And here is the ministerial response.
No problems here.
I guess this is why there was more than 1000 non supportive submissions to the Highlands Council process
and two supreme court cases.

Really Minister?
John
Minister Taz.jpg
Minister Taz.jpg (102.7 KiB) Viewed 3496 times
johnrs
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Mon 09 Aug, 2010 6:09 pm
Region: New South Wales

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby lefroy » Sat 25 Apr, 2020 3:47 pm

Jealous! All I got was a letter saying I would receive a letter of 'nothing to see here bs' in the near future, still waiting
lefroy
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue 05 Feb, 2019 7:46 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Nuts » Sat 25 Apr, 2020 6:08 pm

Oh really? Of the 'hundreds of submissions' and what we know of thousands of objections, which one did they consider?
Nuts
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8325
Joined: Sat 05 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Wilderness Lovers of Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby bushwalker zane » Sun 26 Apr, 2020 5:07 pm

lefroy wrote:Jealous! All I got was a letter saying I would receive a letter of 'nothing to see here bs' in the near future, still waiting


Still waiting on mine too, and the follow up email hasn't been acknowledged either! Useless.
User avatar
bushwalker zane
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon 09 May, 2011 9:46 am
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby stepbystep » Thu 02 Jul, 2020 1:03 pm

Here is a petition and opportunity to communicate directly with those investing in the push to send choppers into the Western Lakes. The investors will receive the petition with your message when you sign up. Please keep it civil. This is about genuinely asking the investors to try and understand why Malbena Matters and why they should abandon their heli-tourism plans.

http://chng.it/WNqCkwV9ZL
The idea of wilderness needs no defense, it only needs defenders ~ Edward Abbey
User avatar
stepbystep
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 7675
Joined: Tue 19 May, 2009 10:19 am
Location: Street urchin
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Hermione » Fri 03 Jul, 2020 3:43 pm

Dear SBS,
thank you for devoting your own time and energy to advocate for our wilderness areas.
"Wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity of the human spirit"
User avatar
Hermione
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Wed 27 Mar, 2013 3:50 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Female

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby stepbystep » Sat 04 Jul, 2020 11:20 am

Thanks Hermoine ... it's easier to follow the social channels for the FAWAHA group if you'd like to stay across it all. For example we post this today.

World Heritage Land leased to a 10 day old, $29 Company. With more information surfacing on who is backing this proposal this may be of interest. When Elise Archer MP - Liberal Member for Clark signed the lease for a 10 hectare World Heritage Island she signed it over to a company that was 10 days old and valued at $29. I'm sure we can all find $29 and submit a bad idea to the Minister. Who wants an island?

106920907_572759510026815_2277413806363906482_n.jpg
106920907_572759510026815_2277413806363906482_n.jpg (69.27 KiB) Viewed 884 times


Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FAWAHATas/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AndFishers
The idea of wilderness needs no defense, it only needs defenders ~ Edward Abbey
User avatar
stepbystep
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 7675
Joined: Tue 19 May, 2009 10:19 am
Location: Street urchin
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby north-north-west » Sat 04 Jul, 2020 11:39 am

290,000 shares worth a total of $29 = $0.00001 per share, or one hundredth of a cent each. What an investment opportunity!!!
"Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens."
User avatar
north-north-west
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 12499
Joined: Thu 14 May, 2009 7:36 pm
Location: The Asylum
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Social Misfits Anonymous
Region: Tasmania

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby stepbystep » Sat 04 Jul, 2020 4:47 pm

north-north-west wrote:290,000 shares worth a total of $29 = $0.00001 per share, or one hundredth of a cent each. What an investment opportunity!!!


It gives a scarily realistic representation of the value these plodders give on what I can only see as priceless. It makes the battle for hearts and minds a confusing affair.
The idea of wilderness needs no defense, it only needs defenders ~ Edward Abbey
User avatar
stepbystep
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 7675
Joined: Tue 19 May, 2009 10:19 am
Location: Street urchin
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Lophophaps » Sun 05 Jul, 2020 9:35 am

Paying $29 is a peppercorn lease. See
https://www.intheblack.com/articles/201 ... orn-leases
The term “peppercorn lease” is generally used to describe a lease that has nil or nominal lease payments. For the purposes of the standard, the term also includes leases with lease payments that are more than nominal but significantly below market value, principally to enable an NFP to further its objective

*** extract ends.

The following figures are very rough but give an idea of the situation. The fixed camp could cost $200,000, about double the cost of the same build in a city. The cost of this is 3% so $600 a year for an interest only loan. A principle and interest loan would be around $15,000 a year. Getting the loan is doubtful given that Mr Hackett has a history of business failures, Further, unlike a principle place of residence, the Halls Island buildings are poor security. The reason is that while a PPOR can be sold, there would be very few people or corporations wiling to buy. Also, a court case or a change of government views can scupper the entire scheme. Hence, in my view the funds would have to be put up by the backers or they use a more secure asset as collateral, like their homes. Risky.

From memory there is advice advice about 240 clients a year paying $3000, a total of $720,000. A commercial markup may be 20-40%; this varies quite a bit. Using 30% this means that costs are $500,000 with $220,000 profit. This would go to the backers, with most to Mr Hackett. Say he gets $120,000 and the other backers get $100,000.

If the money is borrowed then the return on investment is huge, albeit with effort taking people fishing and administration. The $29 lease does not reflect the market value of the venture, and could be seen as a gift by the government. That is, there seems to be a breach of fiduciary duty by the minister, and this is something that the Auditor-General could investigate.

Does anyone know of similar leases and their cost, perhaps the OLT huts?
User avatar
Lophophaps
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed 09 Nov, 2011 9:45 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Nuts » Sun 05 Jul, 2020 10:52 am

What is it? Doesn't that document/ part of(?) represent DH's share in the company , not the lease payment? The other similar document clipped(?) on the FWAHAT page includes the other shareholders at $162500?
Nuts
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8325
Joined: Sat 05 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Wilderness Lovers of Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby stepbystep » Sun 05 Jul, 2020 11:42 am

Nuts wrote:What is it? Doesn't that document/ part of(?) represent DH's share in the company , not the lease payment? The other similar document clipped(?) on the FWAHAT page includes the other shareholders at $162500?


The other shareholders came later. This clipping was what Archer signed off on. A 10 day old company with $29 worth of shares.
The idea of wilderness needs no defense, it only needs defenders ~ Edward Abbey
User avatar
stepbystep
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 7675
Joined: Tue 19 May, 2009 10:19 am
Location: Street urchin
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Nuts » Sun 05 Jul, 2020 12:21 pm

Zero experience with leases here, but can imagine that getting copies of documents and dealings is made as difficult as possible.

There's nothing unusual about forming a company to start a business in this industry. And to show the least possible equity. This may seem dodgy but who else of us offer up personal assets in order to make their income (nobody in the public service, that's a given)? I'd expect all our favourite small businesses, involved with inherently risky operations, are started just this way.

At the same time the public would expect that a company proposing to built on and alter our wilderness would have the means to clean up or maintain their mess (as may happen with a tender agreement or should happen with eg. a mining lease) or pay their lease fee (when due, it's on hold for six months iirc). If the lease or other documents eg. required the other shareholders involvement or some means to show enough free $, fair enough. I could imagine this hasn't happened.
Nuts
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8325
Joined: Sat 05 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Wilderness Lovers of Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby taswegian » Sun 05 Jul, 2020 2:13 pm

north-north-west wrote:290,000 shares worth a total of $29 = $0.00001 per share, or one hundredth of a cent each. What an investment opportunity!!!

Wow NNW, you've just converted me.
A once ardent environmental lover has just seen the light and done what the proponent did and abandoned all previous stated preferences and gone money hungry.
How do I buy up these shares. I'm all in :D


I trust you didn't choke on your cappuccino :P
User avatar
taswegian
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue 27 Jul, 2010 8:34 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Nuts » Mon 06 Jul, 2020 1:27 pm

Strikes, Floods, Landslides, Wildfires, EOI, Viruses and the Merino Mob... 1c per 10,000 seems about right.
Nuts
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8325
Joined: Sat 05 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Wilderness Lovers of Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Lophophaps » Fri 10 Jul, 2020 6:18 pm

This evening I received an email from TNPA

Bad News! The Supreme Court’s decision on the appeal by TWS and TNPA was handed down late on Monday afternoon (6 July 2020).

Neither of our grounds of appeal succeeded. Obviously, this is extremely disappointing. We made a media release with The Wilderness Society the following day which can be read here.
https://tnpa.us16.list-manage.com/track ... eedf5619fc

The initial feedback from our legal team is that the decision is disappointing not only for the future of Halls Island. The decision does not fully explain the reasoning used by the Court and hence it is of limited use in clarifying the process for assessing future development proposals on reserved land. You can read the court’s full decision here.
https://tnpa.us16.list-manage.com/track ... eedf5619fc

The deadline for appealing this decision is 27 July (three weeks from now). TNPA and TWS are considering our options but the cost of further legal action is a major consideration.

Our appeal contended that the Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal improperly delegated its assessment of the Lake Malbena proposal to Tasmania’s Parks and Wildlife Service and did not undertake its own assessment of the proposal against the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan. The Court’s findings related to this legal point, not the merits of the proposal itself.

Regards,

Nick Sawyer, President
User avatar
Lophophaps
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed 09 Nov, 2011 9:45 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby johnw » Sat 11 Jul, 2020 12:11 pm

Thanks Lophophaps. I received that email also, possibly along with others here.
Very disappointing, but I think it's important to note that they haven't given up just yet.
Looks like the Federal Minister has the ball at present.
John W

In Nature's keeping they are safe, but through the agency of man destruction is making rapid progress - John Muir c1912
User avatar
johnw
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 6241
Joined: Wed 23 Jan, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Macarthur Region - SW Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Nuts » Sat 11 Jul, 2020 12:37 pm

Lophophaps wrote:The Court’s findings related to this legal point, not the merits of the proposal itself.


Here's the problem, and it's fundamental. All quaff aside, who ever thought the intent of Wilderness World Heritage would ever include access exclusive on the basis of nothing more than wealth, unnecessary overflights and sectioned-off private areas treated to urban like planning?

Equally as concerning, it's apparent 'a 'proposal' is open ended. At Lake Rodway the proponent seems to have just added in a standing camp, at least (so far) in their own interpretation.
Nuts
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8325
Joined: Sat 05 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Wilderness Lovers of Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Lophophaps » Sat 11 Jul, 2020 2:21 pm

johnw wrote:Very disappointing, but I think it's important to note that they haven't given up just yet. Looks like the Federal Minister has the ball at present.


Some people may say that the federal minister lacks the gumption, and the question of balls then arises. I cannot see a federal LNP government siding with conservation views over business views, even if the latter are very flawed.

Nuts wrote: the problem, and it's fundamental. All quaff aside, who ever thought the intent of Wilderness World Heritage would ever include access exclusive on the basis of nothing more than wealth, unnecessary overflights and sectioned-off private areas treated to urban like planning?

Equally as concerning, it's apparent 'a 'proposal' is open ended. At Lake Rodway the proponent seems to have just added in a standing camp, at least (so far) in their own interpretation.


Quite so. Saying that wealth is a prerequisite for national perk access is absurd. The private OLT huts are different in that they do not affect the masses staying at or near the PWS huts. Halls Island access is being severely curtailed. The Lake Rodway development could be an example of the salami technique. Get a toehold, then slowly expand. There was a flow chart of this posted above.

One hope may be that PWS monitors the development very closely, including water quality. If it takes drones to get pics of the miscreants fishing away from Malbena or otherwise breaking the law I can accept the short-term impact for the long-term good.
User avatar
Lophophaps
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed 09 Nov, 2011 9:45 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Luxury camp inside Walls of Jerusalem WHA with heli acce

Postby Nuts » Sat 11 Jul, 2020 3:48 pm

Lophophaps wrote: The private OLT huts are different in that they do not affect the masses staying at or near the PWS huts. Halls Island access is being severely curtailed.


I guess it's only inside the huts that is off limits (?). Still I can imagine the opposition would be far more widespread if Halls Island was the first such ingress. And also, as numbers increase for the use of private huts they stagnate for public walkers. Everyone has access to the public facilities (and the track). For want of who actually builds more acceptable sleeping space (which can, afterall, just be a tent platform) the capacity will be taken up by exclusive tours and at an expense to the public pool of places.This is set to repeat on many tracks, now with the advantage of the perception that it's the accepted norm.
Nuts
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8325
Joined: Sat 05 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Wilderness Lovers of Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Previous

Return to Tasmania

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests