damoprz wrote:I...........Also, none of your Pics will load for me.
damoprz wrote:It was a great weekend for it. I wish I had organised my time better, instead I get this rainy, windy weekend coming.
Also, none of your Pics will load for me.
JohnStrider wrote:EDIT: Think it's fixed now?
north-north-west wrote:It's a track, not a trail.
north-north-west wrote:'Elsewhere you can use whichever term you like, with the exception of the AAWT which is a track from beginning to end.
north-north-west wrote:The T in AAWT still stands for track, even if you're walking on sealed road.
And unfortunately they hike instead of bushwalk....Lophophaps wrote:north-north-west wrote:The T in AAWT still stands for track, even if you're walking on sealed road.
True. Two routes (for want of a better term) in the same place means that this place has two names, and which one is used depends on which route is used. You drive on the Hotham Road and walk east from The Twins on the AAWT, which is the Hotham Road for a while. Then the AAWT follows the Mt Loch Road aka Machinery Spur.
I don't like "trail". Too many US words are ill-advised for Australia. Think cookies, bathroom and Trump. I note with interest that much of the US lacks toilets.
north-north-west wrote:'Trail' is a Yank term, hence its popularity in many states. In Victoria and Tassie we use the Australian word for a path through the bush intended for human foot traffic, which is 'track'.
In other words, if you're in Vic or Toz, it's a track. Elsewhere you can use whichever term you like, with the exception of the AAWT which is a track from beginning to end.
north-north-west wrote:It's a track, not a trail.
stry wrote:north-north-west wrote:It's a track, not a trail.
Way to go NNW.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 11 guests