Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Bushwalking topics that are not location specific.
Forum rules
The place for bushwalking topics that are not location specific.

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby B3n » Wed 01 Apr, 2015 5:07 pm

Not that another opinion is really needed here but... I'd hike for day or two. Longer than that and I'd be trekking (I think this is a more euro term that I've picked up). Also tend to use 'trail' over 'track' since I started mountain biking - a sport which has definite roots in North America.

My Dad uses 'walk' almost exclusively and I tend to associate walking and bushwalking with older folk :lol:
User avatar
B3n
Nothofagus gunnii
Nothofagus gunnii
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue 31 Mar, 2015 1:39 am
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Adventure Friends
Region: Queensland

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby izogi » Wed 01 Apr, 2015 6:48 pm

B3n wrote:Not that another opinion is really needed here but... I'd hike for day or two. Longer than that and I'd be trekking (I think this is a more euro term that I've picked up). Also tend to use 'trail' over 'track' since I started mountain biking - a sport which has definite roots in North America.


I don't know the origins of 'trekking' but it was being used lots in South America (at least Chile, Peru, Bolivia) when I was there around 2007. It was the main English-language word that'd been picked up for use in most of the English tourism publications. It's interesting in some ways because I'd have thought there would be lots of North American influence in the tourism industry there, but maybe not enough to win out on the marketing language. I don't know what's popular there now.

I'm definitely a 'track' user more than a 'trail' user. :)
User avatar
izogi
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri 10 Sep, 2010 6:14 pm
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Jeffoir1 » Sun 12 Apr, 2015 4:21 pm

In our family, for over 70 years, the words "walking" and "bushwalking" were synonymous. Never hiking. Cheers!
Walking takes longer... Thus it stretches time and prolongs life. Life is already too short to waste on speed. ~ Edward Abbey
User avatar
Jeffoir1
Nothofagus gunnii
Nothofagus gunnii
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun 26 Oct, 2014 4:09 pm
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby vicrev » Sun 12 Apr, 2015 6:52 pm

Jeffoir1 wrote:In our family, for over 70 years, the words "walking" and "bushwalking" were synonymous. Never hiking. Cheers!
Mmm.... I can relate to that ,hitch-hiking,yes,just hiking rarely,it was usually "going for a walk"...........
vicrev
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon 18 Feb, 2013 4:27 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby GPSGuided » Sun 12 Apr, 2015 7:41 pm

So, do we have an outcome yet and a proposal for a standard definition? From this day forward, all BWA members will need to adhere to defined usage or face a ban...
Just move it!
User avatar
GPSGuided
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon 13 May, 2013 2:37 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Allchin09 » Mon 13 Apr, 2015 1:51 pm

GPSGuided wrote:So, do we have an outcome yet and a proposal for a standard definition? From this day forward, all BWA members will need to adhere to defined usage or face a ban...


Haha. I'll see if I can get an article added to the Bushwalking NSW website on it!
Tackling the unknown and the awesome one adventure at a time!

Check out my latest trips at http://aoacblog.wordpress.com/posts
Allchin09
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Fri 27 Apr, 2012 3:24 pm
Location: The Shire
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Sydney Bush Walkers
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby JohnStrider » Mon 13 Apr, 2015 2:33 pm

Aren't they one and the same?
JohnStrider
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Fri 12 Dec, 2014 12:34 pm
Location: Melbourne
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Allchin09 » Tue 14 Apr, 2015 1:29 am

JohnStrider wrote:Aren't they one and the same?


Originally, no; bushwalking and hiking were quite different things. These days however it is common for them to be used interchangeably.
Tackling the unknown and the awesome one adventure at a time!

Check out my latest trips at http://aoacblog.wordpress.com/posts
Allchin09
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Fri 27 Apr, 2012 3:24 pm
Location: The Shire
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Sydney Bush Walkers
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby vicrev » Tue 14 Apr, 2015 8:53 am

Does it really matter ?......
vicrev
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon 18 Feb, 2013 4:27 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby GPSGuided » Tue 14 Apr, 2015 9:06 am

It mattered to have a multi-page thread.
Just move it!
User avatar
GPSGuided
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon 13 May, 2013 2:37 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Picaro » Tue 14 Apr, 2015 10:29 am

Some days I spend a lot of time hiking my pants up while bushwalking. And some days I do a lot of walking trying to find the trail to get back on track
User avatar
Picaro
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu 25 Oct, 2012 5:35 am
Location: Tamborine Mountain
Region: Queensland
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Nungulba » Mon 11 May, 2015 1:21 pm

CFPhillips wrote:Hi Mike,

Thanks for checking out our latest issue.

You can find an extended version of the story on our website (I posted the link in a previous comment, I think), which was released prior to the magazine becoming available. I began looking into this topic after undertaking some research via Google Trends. It was only after <i>Wild</i> had published this first online version of the story was this forum topic pointed out to me by a reader.

Feel free to contact me directly if you would like to see more of the Google search term data.


And then, of course, there is 'tramping' as our friends across the Tasman call it??? (Which seems to have caught on here in Oz as well: see The Tasmanian Tramp - another excellent magazine!
Nungulba
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun 14 Oct, 2012 8:14 pm
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby JulianS » Mon 11 May, 2015 11:23 pm

I think I will be going against the grain a bit here. I use both terms, but if someone tells me they're going for a 'bushwalk' I have a picture in my mind of a day trip, nothing more. A 'hike' on the other hand I would assume to be multi-day, carrying tents, etc.

I will also echo a point made above, which is that 'hiking' may be a more versatile term. If I was going on a coastal walk - i.e. mainly beach/sand walking - I don't think I'd feel comfortable calling it a bushwalk.
JulianS
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue 13 Aug, 2013 9:15 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby juxtaposer » Mon 21 Sep, 2015 9:30 am

I know of many bushwalking clubs, but offhand can't think of any hiking ones. In the 1930's there was a Hikers' Club of Sydney, but after a few years it changed its name to the Rucksack Club when it found that the other walking clubs would not take its credentials seriously. They resented the term "hiking" for its commercialised overtones associated with the "hiking craze" of the early 30's, which they considered to be a belittling of their more serious pursuit. Not so long ago there were still enough of the old brigade around to chide people like me whenever we said the word "hiking" instead of "bushwalking". "Bushwalking" is a home grown term endemic to Australia, whereas "hiking" I understand is an Americanisation now co opted locally by marketers who would like to apply a universal standard. Even this forum is supposed to be a bushwalking forum, yet scroll down the pages and count how many times you see headings like "multi day hikes", "Hiking paradox", "Hiking Movie", "knives on hikes", "Missing Hikers" etc etc etc. It seems at this rate we might be headed for another "hiking craze".
juxtaposer
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu 27 Jan, 2011 4:20 pm
Region: New South Wales

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby vicrev » Mon 21 Sep, 2015 10:12 am

When I was younger :roll: ...there were two terms associated with hiking....to'' hike , meant walking wherever....to'' hitch hike'' meant sticking your thumb out to get a lift from passing cars,the term hike has been in this country for a long time.... :)
vicrev
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon 18 Feb, 2013 4:27 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby MickyB » Mon 21 Sep, 2015 10:33 am

I'm not sure I use either term. Normally I just ask my hiking partner if he wants to go bush.
Sometimes, I use big words I don't always fully understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.
User avatar
MickyB
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 1426
Joined: Thu 28 Jun, 2012 7:50 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby whitefang » Mon 21 Sep, 2015 10:46 am

I'm not sure it really matters what word you use. It's the same activity. Personally, I have adopted the term hiking purely because of two reasons, a) when I first became interested it was the first term I could think of and search results were plentiful, and b) it's easier to say.
User avatar
whitefang
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed 09 Apr, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide Hills
Region: South Australia
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby izogi » Mon 21 Sep, 2015 10:48 am

juxtaposer wrote:Not so long ago there were still enough of the old brigade around to chide people like me whenever we said the word "hiking" instead of "bushwalking". "Bushwalking" is a home grown term endemic to Australia, whereas "hiking" I understand is an Americanisation now co opted locally by marketers who would like to apply a universal standard.


I'm not sure if or how it fits in Australia, but in the New Zealand context (where the local dialect tends to use 'tramping' rather than 'bushwalking') there was a recent letters-to-the-editor exchange in the August 2015 Federated Mountain Clubs bulletin. FMC nationally represents and lobbies on behalf of the majority of tramping and other outdoor recreation clubs, and some other users, around the country.

Letter 1: "I object to the American word, 'hikes' instead of 'tramps'. Please object, every time that word is used."

Letter 2: "I agree with the sentiments expressed. It also relates to 'trails' and a whole host of other Americanisms, which some New Zealanders feel compelled to mimic for pathetic cultural cringe reasons. This is partly tied up with marketing; by using these terms some advertisers think they will sell more."

Editor's response:
Use of the words 'hiking' and 'trails', may be seen as creeping Americanisms in our language, but actually both terms have a far longer history of use here than most people acknowledge. Some early tramping clubs in New Zealand called themselves 'hiking clubs'; for example there was an 'Auckland YMCA Hiking Club' formed in 1918. A search on the Papers Past website shows use of these terms, in the concept of walking, by New Zealand newspapers dating back to the 1930s and earlier. For example, a photograph appeared in the Auckland Star, 22 March 1932, showing members of the Alpine Sports Club descending a gorge in the Waitakeres with the caption heading 'Hiking in Earnest, Tramping in the week-end is not always easy'.

Furthermore, the American influence on how we manage outdoor recreation has been of far greater importance than anything from England. For example, the idea of a national park is an American concept, one that we adopted very early on (the UK didn't create their first national park until the 1950s). Should we avoid use of the term 'national park' because it is an Americanism? The idea of hte long distance hiking trail is also largely an American idea, so using the term Te Araroa 'Trail' in New Zealand seems entirely appropriate to me.

To anyone who bemoans creeping Americanisms in New Zealand English, can I suggest reading Bill Bryson's Mother Tongue? Bryson points out that the way the Americans pronounce and spell English is closer to how the British did it in the 1600s (when the first British settlers arrived in America), so in fact it's British English that has changed more.

While the FMC Bulletin will continue to use the words 'tramping' and 'tracks' in most situations, sometimes 'hiking' and 'trails' will be used---for the above reasons by also for the simple expedient of maintaining diversity in the language we offer readers.
User avatar
izogi
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri 10 Sep, 2010 6:14 pm
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby muffin man » Mon 21 Sep, 2015 12:54 pm

I haven't read every post but, recently coming back into what I once called bush walking I now seem to just refer as, going for a walk.
However as I'm looking at purchasing some stuff all of the Australian sites now refer to everything as hiking gear.
muffin man
Nothofagus gunnii
Nothofagus gunnii
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri 28 Aug, 2015 1:36 pm
Region: South Australia

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Hermione » Thu 24 Sep, 2015 5:22 pm

I also tend to just say going for a walk. I sometimes need to explain this to non-bushwalkers, as in "why are you going all the way to Tasmania (or wherever it is) for a walk?."
"Wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity of the human spirit"
User avatar
Hermione
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed 27 Mar, 2013 3:50 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Female

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby flyfisher » Thu 24 Sep, 2015 7:36 pm

Tassie is a great place to come to for a Stroll on some of our

tracks in the bush with a few other blokes and shielas.

No need for cultural cringe, eh.

Flyfisher
If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you need to drink more.
User avatar
flyfisher
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Sat 14 Jul, 2007 8:39 pm
Location: hobart
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: landrover owners club of tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby muffin man » Thu 24 Sep, 2015 8:15 pm

muffin man
Nothofagus gunnii
Nothofagus gunnii
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri 28 Aug, 2015 1:36 pm
Region: South Australia

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby juxtaposer » Sat 03 Oct, 2015 5:25 pm

A small matter, but one of considerable significance arose a few weeks ago when the Hikers' Club of Sydney changed its name to the Rucksack Club, unknowingly choosing the same name as the leading English rock-climbing Society. The reason for the change is obvious. The term "Hiking" has not met with favour in Sydney, despite the fact that its origin is Anglo-Saxon, not American, and that its use has been blessed by the great Lord Baden Powell and the Scout Movement generally. "Bushwalking " is the term that Sydney prefers, or, to be more precise, has invented and added to its dictionary. The efficient recreational walker who knows how to camp as well as walk is, with us, a "bushwalker", not a "hiker." It is hikers who go out and get lost; it is bushwalkers who rescue them. It is hikers who leave their fires alight, often causing bush fires, or despoil the landscape by leaving papers, tins and orange peel about; it is bushwalkers who put out fires and clear away litter. In short, the hiker is, in Sydney's opinion, the muddling inefficient; the bushwalker, the expert. Thus it is that the Hikers' Club of Sydney, which took its name thinking it was following the best traditions, has seen fit to eliminate the word which has fallen into disfavour and to adopt something else. It is also significant that "Paddy" Pallin who used to sell "hiking" gear, now sells only "camp gear for walkers"!
Marie Byles, "The Sydney Bushwalker", No. 32, January 1937.
juxtaposer
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu 27 Jan, 2011 4:20 pm
Region: New South Wales

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Strider » Sat 03 Oct, 2015 5:38 pm

juxtaposer wrote:It is hikers who go out and get lost; it is bushwalkers who rescue them.

I really liked this bit :)

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
User avatar
Strider
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 6030
Joined: Mon 07 Nov, 2011 6:55 pm
Location: Point Cook
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby north-north-west » Sat 03 Oct, 2015 5:53 pm

juxtaposer wrote:It is hikers who go out and get lost; it is bushwalkers who rescue them.

I might adopt that as a signature. It's beautiful.
"Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens."
User avatar
north-north-west
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 15069
Joined: Thu 14 May, 2009 7:36 pm
Location: The Asylum
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Social Misfits Anonymous
Region: Tasmania

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Lophophaps » Sun 04 Oct, 2015 8:52 pm

juxtaposer wrote:It is hikers who go out and get lost; it is bushwalkers who rescue them. It is hikers who leave their fires alight, often causing bush fires, or despoil the landscape by leaving papers, tins and orange peel about; it is bushwalkers who put out fires and clear away litter. In short, the hiker is, in Sydney's opinion, the muddling inefficient; the bushwalker, the expert.
Marie Byles, "The Sydney Bushwalker", No. 32, January 1937.


Love it, so prescient. These words are 78 years old!
User avatar
Lophophaps
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Wed 09 Nov, 2011 9:45 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby neil_fahey » Mon 05 Oct, 2015 2:08 pm

I'll just leave this here :)

Image

Edit: subscribing
User avatar
neil_fahey
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon 14 Dec, 2009 12:30 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: BushwalkingBlog.com.au
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Dutchy » Fri 16 Oct, 2015 3:23 am

A day walk I'd call bushwalking (just a walk, as the word says),
A weekender is hiking (a fair hike),
A larger trek is trekking....
Blame my European origin, it seems to categorise nicely....
And I go on tracks, not trails.... That's for the US....
User avatar
Dutchy
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu 25 Sep, 2008 3:58 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby Rick » Fri 16 Oct, 2015 7:09 pm

I bushwalk on a track, not hike on a trail but I go trail running on a track. :?
User avatar
Rick
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri 09 Jan, 2009 1:55 pm
Region: Tasmania

Re: Are we hiking or bushwalk?

Postby racca » Mon 02 Nov, 2015 12:14 pm

JulianS wrote:I think I will be going against the grain a bit here. I use both terms, but if someone tells me they're going for a 'bushwalk' I have a picture in my mind of a day trip, nothing more. A 'hike' on the other hand I would assume to be multi-day, carrying tents, etc.

I will also echo a point made above, which is that 'hiking' may be a more versatile term. If I was going on a coastal walk - i.e. mainly beach/sand walking - I don't think I'd feel comfortable calling it a bushwalk.


Exactly what I was goin to say.
I associate bushwalking with day trips and hiking with overnighters.
Don't know why, thats just the way my brain works.
Doesn't matter what you call it though, as long as your'e out enjoying our beautiful country, life is good.
racca
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun 11 Oct, 2015 2:30 pm
Location: Brisbane
Region: Queensland
Gender: Male

PreviousNext

Return to Bushwalking Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests