Washing & Personal Hygiene while Bushwalking [split]

[walkinTas]

Pure water also has a 100% mortality rate.

"Pure" water. Now where do we find that.

Ya missing the point dudes. Sure we pollute our urban environment all the time because its convenient and 'cause we are dumb and don't give a toss. So we escape from all the crap and go and find ourselves some nice clean wilderness. The last thing we need to do is take the pollution with us.

[Ent]

Content removed by poster

[Nuts]

If we do not like what their service or product does then we should not use their service and/or product and guess what, I think they might just change what they are doing. The trick for us is then to better understand what is in a product and even more importantly have the knowledge to consider the impact.

Cheers Brett

ahh... a useful snippet....

or not.... the 'do nothing, use nothing' ideal is often the best goal as far as the environment is concerned. (once again) doesnt require much imagination (or research)

[Son of a Beach]

What I get from this is pretty basic (keep it simple stupid). With a bit more effort and thought less 'complex' products will do.
It doesn't appear to really require detailed research or a thesis citing endless impressive sources? Its good to realise that other people (besides me) will continue to ponder these things.

That sums it up, for me. I like to keep things simple (ideally). However, in practice I usually do fall for the convenience of things which are possibly more hazardous. Especially foods (no, not Maccas).

[Nuts]

Oh no, of course not, hungry Jacks is far better

[north-north-west]

Especially foods (no, not Maccas).

Maccas actually qualifies as food? Wow, they HAVE changed!

[tasadam]

Hi Nik

Looks like we landed a fish above the minimum size restriction

Cheers Brett

And I do have the ability to delete posts... So be nice now... I could have just deleted my post.
I am a Pisces though, so I guess I'll let that slide

[Ent]

Content removed by poster

[tasadam]

It's clear, by the way, or at least it should be, that I clearly hadn't investigated the link before replying, hence the edit.