ten if the lightest pieces of gear

A place to chat about gear and the philosphy of ultralight. Ultralight bushwalking or backpacking focuses on carrying the lightest and simplest kit. There is still a good focus on safety and skill.
Forum rules
Ultralight Bushwalking/backpacking is about more than just gear lists. Ultralight walkers carefully consider gear based on the environment they are entering, the weather forecast, their own skill, other people in the group. Gear and systems are tested and tweaked.
If you are new to this area then welcome - Please remember that although the same ultralight philosophy can be used in all environments that the specific gear and skill required will vary greatly. It is very dangerous to assume that you can just copy someone else's gear list, but you are encouraged to ask questions, learn and start reducing the pack weight and enjoying the freedom that comes.

Common words
Base pack backpacking the mass of the backpack and the gear inside - not including consumables such as food, water and fuel
light backpacking base weight less than 9.1kg
ultralight backpacking base weight less than 4.5kg
super-ultralight backpacking base weight less than 2.3kg
extreme-ultralight backpacking base weight less than 1.4kg

ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby wayno » Thu 05 Jun, 2014 1:21 pm

So with a little bit of research across the board we've come up with what we believe to be the ten lightest bits of outdoors gear around.


http://www.outdoorsmagic.com/outdoor-fe ... 12944.html
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8784
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby icefest » Thu 05 Jun, 2014 1:44 pm

Most seems reasonable, though I disagree about the choice of pack and shelter.
Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful.
User avatar
icefest
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri 27 May, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: www.canyoninginvictoria.org
Region: Victoria

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby wayno » Thu 05 Jun, 2014 1:48 pm

icefest wrote:Most seems reasonable, though I disagree about the choice of pack and shelter.


who's making a lighter 2 person shelter and 55 litre pack?
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8784
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby icefest » Thu 05 Jun, 2014 2:48 pm

Example 35l daypack at 506g is heavier than the Arc Blast 45l which weighs 454g

Example tent is 880g
Zpacks duplex net is 547g
MLD duomid w net inner is 635g
Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful.
User avatar
icefest
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri 27 May, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: www.canyoninginvictoria.org
Region: Victoria

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby wayno » Thu 05 Jun, 2014 2:50 pm

yeah i guess they didnt take a serious look at cottage industries... was it a case of looking at their advertisers gear?
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8784
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby walkerchris77 » Thu 05 Jun, 2014 2:59 pm

Interesting thanks wayno
User avatar
walkerchris77
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Fri 15 Nov, 2013 11:42 am
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby Mark F » Thu 05 Jun, 2014 9:08 pm

Of course they were looking at advertisers or potential advertisers. They mention the Fire Maple FMS-116T and compare it to a rebranded Fire Maple FMS-300T as though they don't know the FIre Maple original exists.

Walking poles at 135 grams per pole - only 12% (with strap) to 35% heavier (no strap) than Ruta Locura poles.
"Perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove".
User avatar
Mark F
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2332
Joined: Mon 19 Sep, 2011 8:14 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory
Gender: Male

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby icefest » Fri 06 Jun, 2014 1:22 am

Mark F wrote: They mention the Fire Maple FMS-116T and compare it to a rebranded Fire Maple FMS-300T as though they don't know the FIre Maple original exists.

I had to giggle about that part too. :lol: :lol:
Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful.
User avatar
icefest
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri 27 May, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: www.canyoninginvictoria.org
Region: Victoria

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby Joomy » Tue 20 Jan, 2015 11:06 pm

Well at least most of the users of this forum know that most of the genuinely lightest gear is from cottage manufacturers that the editors of these magazines have probably never heard of.
Joomy
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue 22 May, 2012 6:40 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory
Gender: Male

Re: ten if the lightest pieces of gear

Postby wayno » Wed 21 Jan, 2015 3:47 pm

well the article is headed "Ten of the lightest" not "The ten lightest", its not that wide of the mark and for those who dont shop online and buy overseas and dont want to pay the shipping for products from overseas, they've got a better chance of coming across the mainstream brands in their local shop...
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8784
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male


Return to Ultralight backpacking

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Facebook [bot] and 4 guests