stry wrote:I'm happy to continue being a voice in the wilderness.
TRACK is not spelt "TRAIL"
darrenedwards wrote:You are correct about your assumption that this is a hobby. I have never, nor do I intend to make any money commercially from this site or my other site .
There are no official guided tour offerings at this stage, but watch this space as they may be available in the future.
darrenedwards wrote:Tortoise. Good question re this comment. "There are no official guided tour offerings at this stage, but watch this space as they may be available in the future."
When I spoke with north-east tourism they suggested that I include this sentence so that people did not think this was a guided adventure, but one for experienced and self-reliant walkers. I have no intent myself to do anything commercially with this but I suspect that others might so I thought it a good idea to mention that.
Re the road walking, yeah, I don't like that much either but I thought it might make the area more accessible without people thinking there would be a need to be erecting huts and camping platforms. I also didn't want to be sending people off-trail. This may never be an iconic walk but can't I start somewhere without my enthusiasm being ripped apart?
paidal_chalne_vala wrote:Look up the word "iconic". It is much misused, misunderstood and misappropriated.
north-north-west wrote:Exactly, Xplora. Walks achieve iconic status through their history' it is not something that can be manufactured or applied to a newly created walk.
Lophophaps wrote:north-north-west wrote:Four people commenting on this thread have about 150 years of BW experience, some at very high levels including instructing, BSAR, commercial leading, active in conservation, active in clubs, senior positions in clubs, BW Victoria, high in Abels, and the like. Experience means that views are generally more informed and more balanced.
Rileyr wrote:You bunch sure are a supportive lot aren't ya's
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests