Looking back at policy/ prospectus might help narrow down what this government has in mind:
Even though these places already all have approved (additional?) proposals ready, set to go (aside from Tarkine).
I'd assume they don't
really mean a boat trip from Strahan to Bathurst hbr.
I'd assume the revenue/usage figures are enhanced, use of the term 'additional', in this case, can only be speculative.
Maybe our park service can provide more insight on this (even if they are forced to consider no opinion other than how to get a proposal underway..) as part of their commitment to public consultation.
For instance, has a short-er list of options already been decided? Has there been consultation already with a commercial partner (ie. 'huts', what does this mean, public huts or commercial huts, huts with heating or heated spa? both?