Discussion about this site, including these forums (eg, suggestions, comments, queries). Topics may be manually deleted occasionally (eg, after suggestions dealt with, or changes bedded in).
Wed 29 Jan, 2014 4:21 pm
Welll.. beside myself was a bit 'tongue in cheek'.. It is a lot easier to defend wilderness already within reserves though. No politics, exaggerations, trade-offs or diss-affected communities, just this concept of 'minimal'-impact and all it entails.
Sat 01 Feb, 2014 4:56 am
(post removed for consideration)
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 4:37 pm
O...K.. Get a bit carried away did we? Too funny!
What an odd thread- forum eat forum! It was actually a great question, interesting concept, worth discussing, a small part of a larger set of issues.. had it all!! It must be obvious that i don't personally like the idea (probably the precedent more than anything). That aside it did get a bit ruff n tumble. I think Matt deserves credit, trying to do the right thing it seems... and yes maybe the best way to limit damage is by increased tailored info. A bit like backburning
I'm not sure, I can't see it but still worth discussion?
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 5:47 pm
Nuts wrote:still worth discussion?
I wouldn't have thought so no.
Seems to me as the only one to comment on this thread for over 2 weeks you are once again trying to entice arguments.
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 6:32 pm
Haha, you still here Trackmaster!!! Anyhow, no. But I can understand how it can be seen that way (can't please everyone). It's also clear that personal attacks are easier for some than either arguments or discussions (or just going away)
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 6:38 pm
Yep, nearly lasting longer than you did as a mod huh. haha lol haha lol
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 6:40 pm
Should I get my stick back just for you whiz?
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 6:42 pm
Sure, why not.
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 6:50 pm
Hmmm, lets see
well... there is that I have better things to do than wipe your bot bot, there's that...
We can keep taking about you or you could add to the discussion... if you thought anything was worth discussing.. which you don't..
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 6:56 pm
Always resort to straight out attack when your blatant attempt to bait fails dont you Paul.
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 7:06 pm
I was responding honestly to your question. I have nothing to console your opinion that it is an attack.
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 7:11 pm
Nuts wrote:I was responding honestly to your question. I have nothing to console your opinion that it is an attack.
which is one of the many reasons you made a poor moderator.
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 7:16 pm
Yeah well, this may come as a revelation but it wasn't my decision to give you such a lengthy ban.. And not being a good moderator in such company I regard as my finest achievement
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 7:21 pm
Anyhow, gotta go, have a lovely weekend Marky
Fri 14 Feb, 2014 7:30 pm
Thanks mate. You too.
Wed 26 Feb, 2014 11:36 am
Which other site is that then Zone-5?
Mon 03 Mar, 2014 1:47 am
Nuts wrote:Which other site is that then Zone-5?
You will have to ask Matt for the link seeing he has removed it for some reason...
Zone-5 wrote:http://bushwalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=215302#p215302
(post removed for consideration)
..but I am sure you are just being rhetorical seeing that it's another advanced hiker site.
See you there...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS: here is a similar site that uses the same format but not for bushwalking...
http://www.fishnet.com.au/information/gps.html =========================
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.