Amanda wrote:Hi abceight,
Your topic headline says it all, they are designed for trail running not hiking. Good trail runners though! MDs can offer you a refund in goodwill at the Canberra store. I'll send you the details in a pm. Phillipsart if you haven't used the tent you should be able to retun it if it is still in it's bag, let me know if you need more information
If anyone ever has feedback on MDs product or services you can always phone Head office on 07 3114 4300 or email them http://www.mountaindesigns.com/about-us/contact-us.aspx. All feedback is welcome!
Cheers
Amanda
Franco wrote:Blisters and shoes falling apart..
That is why I (usually) carry with me some gaffa tape and a small tube of Tarzan grip (or similar) glue.
Franco
Amanda wrote:Hi Phillipsart,
No problems, as I said all feedback is welcome and good for us to learn from. It might be easiest if we deal with the return through the Hobart store. We should be able to find your receipt. I'll send you the details in a pm.
Cheers
Amanda
ollster wrote:Not to sound harsh, but... there are so many threads on this site with hints on appropriate footwear for Tasmania, why do people still end up coming along in sneakers? (bad MDs advice aside, surely it's obvious these are not walking boots?)
Can we please get a sticky thread on "appropriate footwear for Tassie walking?" it can go next to the "what will the weather be like?" thread.
abceight wrote:The saucony shoes I posted with repairs lasted a full traverse of the Arthurs no problem. They were repaired prior to another hike I undertook almost a year later. The thin synthetic turned out to be durable but the mesh eventually scuffed apart. With the Salamon shoes I was not so lucky. A lot of people wear Teva sandles on the South Coast.
Jellybean wrote:do you think it is then either fair or reasonable to slate the manufacturer for the shoes rubbing your toes or falling apart when used in more extreme conditions than the manufacturer intended? IMHO at some point you need to take some responsibility for your own decision making, a one month trip with off-track walking in Tassie is hardly the place to trial a brand new pair of trail runners!
abceight wrote:Jellybean wrote:do you think it is then either fair or reasonable to slate the manufacturer for the shoes rubbing your toes or falling apart when used in more extreme conditions than the manufacturer intended? IMHO at some point you need to take some responsibility for your own decision making, a one month trip with off-track walking in Tassie is hardly the place to trial a brand new pair of trail runners!
I bought some shoes for hiking, they fell apart after about three weeks, I returned them.
Having said all that you are still right. They are trail runners not designed for hiking. Read the title of the post.
ollster wrote:abceight wrote:
Seeing your footwear is just about the most important piece of gear (pretty hard to walk around without!), pissing around with sandals or running shoes is a recipe for disaster.
under10kg wrote:ollster wrote:abceight wrote:
Seeing your footwear is just about the most important piece of gear (pretty hard to walk around without!), pissing around with sandals or running shoes is a recipe for disaster.
I find this rather offensive as I love wearing runners on the WA for example. So much lighter, walk longer with less effort and dry out so much faster than boots. I have done the WA twice.
ollster wrote:I've just had to replace a pair of Scarpa SL-M3 which are about as hard as you can get. I got them for Xmas 2009, they have lasted about 14 months (about 65 days of walking if my memory is right, mostly off track) and I scrub and dry (slowly) and condition them after almost every walk.
Seeing your footwear is just about the most important piece of gear (pretty hard to walk around without!), pissing around with sandals or running shoes is a recipe for disaster.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 75 guests