north-north-west wrote:Why couldn't it have just burnt the approaches to the Coronets and left everything else alone?
icefest wrote:north-north-west wrote:Why couldn't it have just burnt the approaches to the Coronets and left everything else alone?
I'm leaving that godforsaken scrub until that does happen.
aloftas wrote:I really do wonder at the abhorrence of back burning in season, versus the horror of wild fires...
I wonder at the mindset of those who would rather not see backburning and fuel reduction burning.
aloftas wrote:I kind of don't buy the "its too expensive argument"
aloftas wrote:All I am saying, is, I see far less firebreaks on farms, far less slashing...
Nuts wrote:Yes, too many limits (for me). and how many of the current areas, or ecosystems of most concern, would now be (theoretically) 'safe', assuming a free-r hand at the burn-off match?
north-north-west wrote:No, it isn't a simplistic issue, but your questions and responses are worded in ways that suggest you expect simplistic solutions.
Sure, there is wastage. It's inevitable in a bureaucracy. But the main issue facing the reserve system in Tasmania (indeed, throughout Australia) is underfunding by the Government, which is essentially caused by their contempt for our wilderness as anything but a field for resource extraction.
aloftas wrote:Nah, its beaurocratic waste and over educated fools who cant actually see that management is done on a basis of the needs of the job at hand.
aloftas wrote:this is not a simplistic argument
walkabout wrote:Just heard on the radio that the February plains fire has joined with the Lake Mckenzie fire creating one large fire.
Lucky you, those who saw these areas as they were, because they will never be the same again. Boy Miles Dublin plain hut was lost this morning and others are threatened.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests