Wed 22 Jul, 2015 1:32 pm
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 1:56 pm
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 2:25 pm
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 2:35 pm
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 2:47 pm
stepbystep wrote:Certainly wish I could express myself as lucidly as you!
This...
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/ ... 236600.htm
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 3:02 pm
stepbystep wrote:This...
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/ ... 236600.htm
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 7:43 pm
aloftas wrote:stepbystep wrote:Certainly wish I could express myself as lucidly as you!
This...
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/ ... 236600.htm
and this^ was Tolkien only Joking about the Ents?
My Maternal Granny, said; If you don't know the meaning of a word, look it up.
Now go and read book.
With that look...
Old dictionary's are a treasure.
Writing is fun...
Anyway.
Cheers.
I bet its snowy up in them thar hills ...
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 7:50 pm
stepbystep wrote:geoskid wrote:Set me straight.
There's no hope for that. Unless, god forbid, you go for a walk through a forest like this.....................
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 8:14 pm
aloftas wrote:geoskid wrote:
Thanks Aloftas,
I think humans have appointed themselves stewards (where might they have got that idea from) well before we realized we are just another species of animal. Pulling our heads in is probably too late. Happy to read more.
Cheers
I wont get into the theological aspects of stewardship.
What I will say is that we are pretty much the only species on the planet which must modify our habitat and wear clothes for survival..(Except for the rare Bakers Beach type of person)...and where we must modify, the animal kingdom adapts. Look at how a wallaby is at home on a fresh drift of snow...no postholing for that little guy..his nose points him in the direction and off he goes.,,bounding as if without a care and leaving an impression a few inches deep, if that.
No, humans are stewards because of capability, no other reason.
The cerebral coretex and the opposing thumb are a lethal combination.
What needs to happen, is sentience and salience need to collide.
By that, I mean that we must not only be cognizant of our surroundings a the course we are taking, but aware also of the subtleties and "etheric breezes" which are blowing.
Change is coming, and faster than many will anticipate.
We are on a world stage with plenty of overseas visitors. These people need to be accorded the respect they deserve, not to be seen as simply an opportunity for ten bucks a pie and coffee.
We...need to learn to resect the earth on which we tread, look out to the heavens with a sense of wonder, as I can ASSURE you, the heavens are looking at us, with a sense of wonder coupled with despair...
We cant be seen as wood hooking lumberjacks with an interest in minerals.
Timber, mining are essential, but must be held in balance with cutting edge adherence to worlds best practices, and not merely lip service.
Anyway.
Wed 22 Jul, 2015 11:58 pm
corvus wrote:stepbystep wrote:geoskid wrote:Set me straight.
There's no hope for that. Unless, god forbid, you go for a walk through a forest like this.....................
SBS can you confirm that trees like this one are being are those being "harvested" I doubt it is and believe you are being just a wee bit devious /selective with your images.
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 1:50 am
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 2:48 am
corvus wrote:aloftas wrote:stepbystep wrote:Certainly wish I could express myself as lucidly as you!
This...
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/ ... 236600.htm
and this^ was Tolkien only Joking about the Ents?
My Maternal Granny, said; If you don't know the meaning of a word, look it up.
Now go and read book.
With that look...
Old dictionary's are a treasure.
Writing is fun...
Anyway.
Cheers.
I bet its snowy up in them thar hills ...
I just love words and dictionaries how many do you own and consult ? I love my almost 4kg 1940 page Macquarie ,like my Mini Colour Macquarie ,daily use The Penguin 2002 edition but drool over my Leather Bound Compact Oxford English Dictionary of Current English.
Words are power if truthfully used .
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 2:57 am
corvus wrote:aloftas wrote:stepbystep wrote:Certainly wish I could express myself as lucidly as you!
This...
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/ ... 236600.htm
and this^ was Tolkien only Joking about the Ents?
My Maternal Granny, said; If you don't know the meaning of a word, look it up.
Now go and read book.
With that look...
Old dictionary's are a treasure.
Writing is fun...
Anyway.
Cheers.
I bet its snowy up in them thar hills ...
I just love words and dictionaries how many do you own and consult ? I love my almost 4kg 1940 page Macquarie ,like my Mini Colour Macquarie ,daily use The Penguin 2002 edition but drool over my Leather Bound Compact Oxford English Dictionary of Current English.
Words are power if truthfully used .
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 5:43 am
north-north-west wrote:geoskid wrote:north-north-west wrote:What has been made up?
What is being made up in this thread is an alternative story to what has been posted in the public notice by FT. There seems to be a reluctance to accept FT's up front account of what they are going to do.
Some appear to have trouble accepting that Tahune airwalk is having maintenance carried out, and the road is being repaired, and whilst that is happening, taking the opportunity to harvest a coupe.
Some are performing mental gymnastics to imply that FT want to harvest the coupe, and using road closures, or 'denied access ' as a cover, [i]disregarding[/i ]further thought about what this implies and who it might implicate, all because that's what humans unthinkingly do to those who's behaviour we strongly disapprove of.
Set me straight.
Ummmm - so you always believe 100% everything ever said by a government department? I didn't think that level of naivety still existed in this world.
People who have driven on the road within the last few days are telling you it is in fine condition - you think they're making that up just to suit their agenda? But you have no trouble accepting that what FT are saying is completely true? Despite their track record?
You really cannot believe that it's just as likely that - given the history - FT are determined to log those coupes and are using airwalk maintenance as an excuse?
OK. Nice bubble you live in.
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 8:31 am
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 9:39 am
corvus wrote:stepbystep wrote:geoskid wrote:Set me straight.
There's no hope for that. Unless, god forbid, you go for a walk through a forest like this.....................
SBS can you confirm that trees like this one are being are those being "harvested" I doubt it is and believe you are being just a wee bit devious /selective with your images.
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 9:51 am
aloftas wrote: ... May I contend, that if the man says the pics are what they are, then this is what they are.
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 9:58 am
GPSGuided wrote:aloftas wrote: ... May I contend, that if the man says the pics are what they are, then this is what they are.
The irony of this is, why then should one doubt the words of Forestry Tasmania? In a political process, which this obviously also is, one is entitled to question all points of view.
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 11:41 am
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 1:22 pm
GPSGuided wrote:Yet again, the integrity of Forestry Tasmania to politicians have already been questioned in earlier posts. Gets gray doesn't it? It's just way too easy to get personal when discussing political, religious or any contentious issues. If one should post such, then be prepared for the eventualities. Otherwise Tassie weather discussions induce fewer conflicts, in general.
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 1:23 pm
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 1:29 pm
Good on ya GPS....The weather would be a great thing to debate on this forum,the egos would be less to the fore,less agro towards one another ,but, then,maybe not...why are you getting more rain / sunshine/snow than me,it's just not fair .....I knowGPSGuided wrote:Yet again, the integrity of Forestry Tasmania to politicians have already been questioned in earlier posts. Gets gray doesn't it? It's just way too easy to get personal when discussing political, religious or any contentious issues. If one should post such, then be prepared for the eventualities. Otherwise Tassie weather discussions induce fewer conflicts, in general.
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 1:42 pm
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 2:34 pm
vicrev wrote:Good on ya GPS....The weather would be a great thing to debate on this forum,the egos would be less to the fore,less agro towards one another ,but, then,maybe not...why are you getting more rain / sunshine/snow than me,it's just not fair .....I know,I'll blame Bronwyn Bishop & her Helicopter
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 3:41 pm
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 3:54 pm
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 4:04 pm
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 4:06 pm
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 4:09 pm
stepbystep wrote:I actually have no intention of debating the issues, particularly not on this forum, so need no fortification. I've presented some facts, 400 year old ones, what you guys want to do with them is up to you. My opinion is very much settled, stuck in my ways I guess, oh well...
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 4:15 pm
stepbystep wrote:I actually have no intention of debating the issues, particularly not on this forum, so need no fortification. I've presented some facts, 400 year old ones, what you guys want to do with them is up to you. My opinion is very much settled, stuck in my ways I guess, oh well...
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.