South_Aussie_Hiker wrote:A much easier way of understanding it all.
State economics when simplified to such an extent are not that useful nor accurate,
and that's ignoring the fact that that was started by the Tea Party (which have several bias).
Regarding lesson #1 Read these two blogs for another simplified but slightly more accurate interpretation.
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archiv ... implifyinghttp://www.dismalscientists.com/2012/01 ... begin.htmlThen, realise that debt itself is not inherently bad.
Roughly speaking, if your tax base climbs faster than the debt interest then you are npt losing money.
Also, its actually 385, not 38.5 (8 zeros)
Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful.