Avoid posting detailed information on accessing sensitive areas without recognised tracks to public topics, but rather use private messages, email, or other non-public means to communicate such information instead. Feel free to ask questions about such areas publicly, so long as the post includes a reminder of this rule to get answers privately only.
wander wrote:<Snip>
Track or route info will be available on the net somewhere at some point regardless of efforts to stop it getting out.
<Snip>
tas-man wrote:..... so the efforts of Parks to removed tracks from the official records to perhaps allow areas to regenerate, and more focused maintenance and development take place on the more publicised tracks, is bound to fail with the growth of such information on the internet. ......
Michael_Kingston wrote: I would suggest that people like John Chapman may have had an influence here through their books:
Beeper wrote:..... I suppose it depends on what your thresholds of actual / perceived impacts are. ......
Nuts wrote:Do you have a link to the list of tracks/routes rather than just the few examples given in the classification? Perhaps it will give people a better idea of the types of tracks and routes already (at request) desired to be described as per your example.
Beeper wrote:...............I suppose it depends on what your thresholds of actual / perceived impacts are. I know people who think that any human impact in an area is an environmental disaster - what a load of BS. What they are really saying is that they want to keep the area untarnished for themselves......
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests