Tony wrote:... with pot diameter vs flame diameter, a pot that is around 2-4 cm larger diameter that the visible flame diameter is around optimum and that goes for center flame stoves and side flame stoves...
Ah. I didn't realize that I'd need that much "clearance." Interesting. Thank you for that.
I've basically given up on side burners. People talk about how efficient the Jim Wood's Super Cat is. Efficient? Really? I've never been able to get much in the way of efficiency from one, and I've experimented with a couple of different configurations of the basic design. To it's credit, it is very light, very easy to make, and you don't need a separate pot stand.
Tony wrote:I decided that with any fuel or weight saving that adding water to alcohol fuel will give is so small, it is not worth the effort.
Agreed. It's amazing the lengths that some Ultralighters will go to in order to make some strange alcohol set up work. I want something like a Trangia burner: pour in the fuel into a nice big opening, strike a match, and away you go. No priming, no small fueling openings, no fiddly bits. I was a bit interested in water, but then thought better of it because of the fiddle factor. Then I read part two of your BPL paper on alcohol that you did with Roger. Adding water just doesn't seem like it pays.
My current area of research is a light weight alcohol stove that burns high ethanol content alcohol cleanly and efficiently without water. I've been working with a local stove designer. We think we've got a good design, but we need to do more testing. Hopefully, it'll come to something.
HJ